Yes, we are, as long as we still have mountains, lakes, rivers, oceans, prairies, animals, chocolates, pineapples, mangoes, and a beautiful world, we are sensible.

It is really weird because somehow people don’t relate nature with themselves, when we are actually very much the same. We are nature, as nature is in us.

Why do we want to destroy who we are?

I suppose this does not only happen by with nature. We also act constantly against ourselves without being aware of it.

Nature is us as much as we are of it.

The path of self-distruction is not to hate, but to act upon your hatred. For example, you may hate a movie, but it will stop there. You won’t go, and destroy a cinema because they showed it. It is the same thing inside of our minds.

We may even hate parts of us, but hate and love have the same root: You care about something enough to hate it or love it. So, how to find a balance in so many “opposites”?

01We tend to compare things in the same sphere of consciousness, when things are not like that. For example, love can be compared to hate as an opposite if you see love as a feeling. However, if you understand love as a state of being, then it may be harder to compare it with being hateful.

02 Our definitions represent the image we have created of those concepts. Therefore, a comparison is just valid using your own internal processed ideas about what is being compared. Even though, we use dictionaries, those lack the deepness of a human being discovering the reality beyond our communication systems.

It is very easy to say: Hate is the opposite of love, but is that the truth? In what extent of awareness it may be, and when do they begin to unite each other?

This all happens because we are living in a society full of “I AM WHO MY MEMORIES TELL ME I AM”.

That’s ok if that’s what you believe is enough, you don’t want to ask more questions, and you don’t want unveil the truth behind our confusion. Those memories can help us to elaborate complex thought systems that break our traditionally made communication systems.

It is strange, but instead of using thought system to break communication ones, we use communication systems to understand our thought system. I believe we can use both in a spiral, break one, understand one, and in time change our devious ways to become a better person.

Yet, even though, you conclude that egoism is good, famine is good if it is not yours, imprisonment of the body is good because you are free although others may be trapped, and living without the wonder world is good because you will live a rich life, if you have taken time to analyze yourself and question your motives, there is more truth in that than those who say to be generous and have never spent time to analyze why.

However, those who don’t believe in being good to others, surely haven’t found the truth, they still must ask themselves more questions to find the joy of life, instead of living a treat that is keeping you from having a fullfilled life.

It is a serious matter, don’t take it lightly, it is unfair to continue this way. What will our future generations remember us for? Our acts of self-destruction? Because when we contaminate, it is not killing just us, but everything that surrounds us.

Take as an example smoking, those who die first may not be the smoker, but the little daughter that spends her time with her dad.

Please, let her live… Let us live. Let us have a wonder future before it is too late for us to correct what blind adults have done.